10 Billion reasons Microsoft opposes a real document standard

I read about how Microsoft held a conference in Malaysia and had some Q&A about their so-called “OpenXML” file format. When asked “Why did Microsoft push OOXML through the “Fast Track” process instead of the standard ISO process? Wouldn’t they get less resistance than faced now?” the response began:

Office is a USD$10 billion revenue generator for the company. When ODF was made an ISO standard, Microsoft had to react quickly as certain governments have procurement policies which prefer ISO standards. Ecma and OASIS are “international standards”, but ISO is the international “Gold Standard”.

Now, any normal vendor would have ‘reacted quickly’ by implementing ODF quickly. But no, this is Microsoft; digital drug dealers interested in addicting their clients through vendor lock-in rather than generating real demand by creating first-rate products. So to finish the quote:

Microsoft therefore had to rush this standard [OOXML] through. Its a simple matter of commercial interests!

Not in the interest of computer users though; just say NO to OOXML. ODF is the way to go.

[Update 9/27: Even more amazing: Microsoft ITSELF refuses “to commit” to adhere to future versions of the official OOXML ‘standard’. Ugh; its like they aren’t even trying to pretend they’re in favor of interoperability anymore…]

Speaking of, I have a nice little story to share :) Sun has released a plugin for MS Office to allow it to read and write the various ODF file types. A friend of mine works in a small office where some computers run OpenOffice.org and the others run MS Office (possibly more than one version). They were saving files in DOC format to share but a file produced on one computer might not open right (or even open at all!) on another. I suggested the plugin and that problem is now solved :)

(minor update Oct. 4: version 1.1 of the plugin is now out)
Update 2: As an amusement, an image from this article which appears to be Steve Ballmer doing his Lord Voldemort impression… a little too well ^_-

I’m going to fucking kill Harry Pott… er… ODF.


4 Responses to “10 Billion reasons Microsoft opposes a real document standard”

  1. Microsoft vs Standards: reacting “with jealousy and defensiveness” « Limulus Says:

    […] is totally in line with what Microsoft did when it became clear that an XML-based office document format was going to be a new standard. Adobe controls PDF and Flash; Microsoft wants to replace them with […]

  2. Is Office for Mac worth the cost to you? « Limulus Says:

    […] and is an ISO standard. But Microsoft doesn’t support it in Office as they consider it a threat to their file format lock-in. If you must use Office 2008, avoid saving in the new […]

  3. ODF vs MSXML adoption « Limulus Says:

    […] they can gloss over the discrepencies) made into an ISO standard, they’ll maintain most of their Office profits for the time being and maximize their suppression of ODF. However, even so, given that MS Office is […]

  4. The Microsoft Empire « Limulus Says:

    […] now, MS stands on two main monopoly legs: Windows and Office; Server is profitable, but actually faces real competition and so doesn’t show the same […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: